How do the U.S. House of Representatives — Wisconsin District 4 candidates compare?
The 4 candidates side by side, issue by issue. Every stance is a sourced summary — follow the source links to read it in context. This is not a ranking or endorsement.
Or start from the issues you care about →
ⓘ What do these stance labels mean?
Each label describes how a candidate has spoken about an issue, drawn from a sourced statement — not our opinion. Support and oppose mean they've clearly taken that side. Mixed means their statements point both ways. Evolving means their stated position has changed over time. Unclear means we couldn't find a clear public statement. Every label links to the source it came from.
How we do this →ⓘ Sourced position vs. campaign claim — what's the difference?
A sourced position is something we tied to a specific public statement, with a link. A campaign claim is what a candidate's own site says about their priorities. We keep them separate so you can see the difference between a documented stance and a self-description.
How we do this →Education
Donahue references public education among the programs she considers essential and worth funding.
Position sources (1)
- campaignUrban Milwaukee
Moore introduced the Keep Public Funds in Public Schools Act of 2026 to repeal the federal tax credit voucher program, opposing the diversion of public funds to private schools and supporting increased investment in public education.
Position sources (1)
- campaignUrban Milwaukee
No position on record: Purnima Nath, Tim Rogers
Environment Energy
Donahue lists environmental protections among the policies she views as essential and that she argues the country can afford.
Position sources (1)
- campaignUrban Milwaukee
Moore referenced her past advocacy for stricter lead pipe replacement policies.
Position sources (1)
- campaignWisconsin Public Radio
No position on record: Purnima Nath, Tim Rogers
Healthcare
Donahue supports a single-payer, universal healthcare system and states an intent to sign on to Medicare for All (H.R. 3069), describing healthcare as something that should not be driven by insurance profit or tied to employment.
Position sources (1)
- campaignUrban Milwaukee
Moore supports Medicare coverage of in-home elder care and characterized insulin costs as price gouging.
Position sources (1)
- campaignWisconsin Public Radio
No position on record: Purnima Nath, Tim Rogers
Economy Jobs
Moore supports removing barriers to tribal economic development, including enabling tribal governments to finance public infrastructure projects.
Position sources (1)
- campaignUrban Milwaukee
No position on record: Amy Donahue, Purnima Nath, Tim Rogers
Housing
Moore's bill aims to make it easier for tribal governments to build affordable housing, including improving the effectiveness of Low-Income Housing Tax Credits in Indian Country.
Position sources (1)
- campaignUrban Milwaukee
No position on record: Amy Donahue, Purnima Nath, Tim Rogers
Immigration
Moore criticizes ICE's tactics in Milwaukee as excessive and reckless, calling for serious reforms and asserting that all people are entitled to due process regardless of immigration status. She states she refused to provide additional funding to the agency.
Position sources (1)
- campaignUrban Milwaukee
No position on record: Amy Donahue, Purnima Nath, Tim Rogers
Public Safety
Moore describes ICE agents' use of force, including shattering car windows, as terrorizing families and harming residents, and pledges to conduct oversight to protect constituents.
Position sources (1)
- campaignUrban Milwaukee
No position on record: Amy Donahue, Purnima Nath, Tim Rogers
Taxes Budget
Moore introduced legislation to amend the Internal Revenue Code so tribal governments are treated consistently with state and local governments, providing parity in access to tax programs and economic incentives.
Position sources (1)
- campaignUrban Milwaukee
No position on record: Amy Donahue, Purnima Nath, Tim Rogers
Last updated: