Skip to main content
General election: Tuesday, Nov 3. In-person absentee voting may begin Oct 20. Deadlines and how to vote →

← Race pageCertified ballot ↗

U.S. House of Representatives — Wisconsin District 4

The 3 candidates on the November 3, 2026 ballot, side by side, issue by issue. Each stance is a sourced summary, not a ranking or endorsement.

Or start from the issues you care about →

As printed · ballot order

  1. Tim Rogers
    Republican
  2. Gwen Moore
    DemocraticIncumbent

    U.S. Representative

  3. Arthur Burks
    Independent

See everyone who ran in the August 11, 2026 primary →

Economy & jobs

Tim Rogers

No sourced position on record.

Gwen Moore

Stance · support

Moore supports removing barriers to tribal economic development, including enabling tribal governments to finance public infrastructure projects.

Position sources (1)

Arthur Burks

No sourced position on record.

Education

Tim Rogers

No sourced position on record.

Gwen Moore

Stance · support

Moore introduced the Keep Public Funds in Public Schools Act of 2026 to repeal the federal tax credit voucher program, opposing the diversion of public funds to private schools and supporting increased investment in public education.

Position sources (1)

Arthur Burks

No sourced position on record.

Environment & energy

Tim Rogers

No sourced position on record.

Gwen Moore

Stance · support

Moore referenced her past advocacy for stricter lead pipe replacement policies.

Position sources (1)

Arthur Burks

No sourced position on record.

Healthcare

Tim Rogers

No sourced position on record.

Gwen Moore

Stance · support

Moore supports Medicare coverage of in-home elder care and characterized insulin costs as price gouging.

Position sources (1)

Arthur Burks

No sourced position on record.

Housing

Tim Rogers

No sourced position on record.

Gwen Moore

Stance · support

Moore's bill aims to make it easier for tribal governments to build affordable housing, including improving the effectiveness of Low-Income Housing Tax Credits in Indian Country.

Position sources (1)

Arthur Burks

No sourced position on record.

Immigration

Tim Rogers

No sourced position on record.

Gwen Moore

Stance · oppose

Moore criticizes ICE's tactics in Milwaukee as excessive and reckless, calling for serious reforms and asserting that all people are entitled to due process regardless of immigration status. She states she refused to provide additional funding to the agency.

Position sources (1)

Arthur Burks

No sourced position on record.

Public safety

Tim Rogers

No sourced position on record.

Gwen Moore

Stance · oppose

Moore describes ICE agents' use of force, including shattering car windows, as terrorizing families and harming residents, and pledges to conduct oversight to protect constituents.

Position sources (1)

Arthur Burks

No sourced position on record.

Taxes & budget

Tim Rogers

No sourced position on record.

Gwen Moore

Stance · support

Moore introduced legislation to amend the Internal Revenue Code so tribal governments are treated consistently with state and local governments, providing parity in access to tax programs and economic incentives.

Position sources (1)

Arthur Burks

No sourced position on record.

ⓘ What do these stance labels mean?

Each label describes how a candidate has spoken about an issue, drawn from a sourced statement — not our opinion. Support and oppose mean they've clearly taken that side. Mixed means their statements point both ways. Evolving means their stated position has changed over time. Unclear means we couldn't find a clear public statement. Every label links to the source it came from.

How we do this →
ⓘ Sourced position vs. campaign claim — what's the difference?

A sourced position is something we tied to a specific public statement, with a link. A campaign claim is what a candidate's own site says about their priorities. We keep them separate so you can see the difference between a documented stance and a self-description.

How we do this →

How this page was made

Who made this
Tarik Moody, in Milwaukee, independently. No ads, and no party, campaign or PAC money. Nobody has editorial input. About BadgerBrief
How facts get in
Ballot names come from the Wisconsin Elections Commission’s certified list, printed as you will see them. Votes are read from official roll calls; money from the Ethics Commission and the FEC. Positions and quotes appear only after a person checks each one against its source. Methodology
Last updated
Not covered
BadgerBrief does not rate, endorse or predict. Where a fact could not be sourced it is left out, not guessed. Local questions and city or village contests are on MyVote ↗.