How do the U.S. House of Representatives — Wisconsin District 6 candidates compare?
The 4 candidates side by side, issue by issue. Every stance is a sourced summary — follow the source links to read it in context. This is not a ranking or endorsement.
Or start from the issues you care about →
ⓘ What do these stance labels mean?
Each label describes how a candidate has spoken about an issue, drawn from a sourced statement — not our opinion. Support and oppose mean they've clearly taken that side. Mixed means their statements point both ways. Evolving means their stated position has changed over time. Unclear means we couldn't find a clear public statement. Every label links to the source it came from.
How we do this →ⓘ Sourced position vs. campaign claim — what's the difference?
A sourced position is something we tied to a specific public statement, with a link. A campaign claim is what a candidate's own site says about their priorities. We keep them separate so you can see the difference between a documented stance and a self-description.
How we do this →Education
Grothman lists promoting skills-based education and refinancing student loans among his district priorities.
Position sources (1)
- campaignGlenn Grothman
No position on record: Matthew Arndt, Amanda Bell, Brad Smith
Elections Democracy
Grothman lists restoring integrity to elections as a priority.
Position sources (1)
- campaignGlenn Grothman
No position on record: Matthew Arndt, Amanda Bell, Brad Smith
Healthcare
Grothman supports getting more generic medication on the market as a priority.
Position sources (1)
- campaignGlenn Grothman
No position on record: Matthew Arndt, Amanda Bell, Brad Smith
Last updated: