Skip to main content
General election: Tuesday, Nov 3. In-person absentee voting may begin Oct 20. Deadlines and how to vote →

← Race pageCertified ballot ↗

State Treasurer of Wisconsin

The 2 candidates on the November 3, 2026 ballot, side by side, issue by issue. Each stance is a sourced summary, not a ranking or endorsement.

Or start from the issues you care about →

As printed · ballot order

  1. John S. Leiber
    RepublicanIncumbent

    Incumbent Wisconsin State Treasurer

  2. Yee Leng Xiong
    Democratic

    Executive Director at New Beginnings for Refugees; Marathon County Supervisor; D.C. Everest School Board Treasurer

See everyone who ran in the August 11, 2026 primary →

Economy & jobs

John S. Leiber

No sourced position on record.

Yee Leng Xiong

Stance · support

Xiong says he would expand financial literacy so families have tools to save and plan, and return unclaimed property to families.

Position sources (1)

Education

John S. Leiber

Stance · support

Leiber emphasizes safeguarding and growing the Common School Fund, which distributes money annually to K-12 school libraries for materials and technology.

Position sources (1)

Yee Leng Xiong

Stance · support

Xiong lists protecting and growing the state's school trust fund among his priorities for the treasurer's office, which oversees funding for K-12 school libraries and instructional materials.

Position sources (1)

Environment & energy

John S. Leiber

No sourced position on record.

Yee Leng Xiong

Stance · support

Xiong states he would balance conservation with sustainable revenue from public lands to support education.

Position sources (1)

Taxes & budget

John S. Leiber

Stance · support

Leiber identifies as a fiscal conservative focused on sound financial management and saving taxpayer dollars while opposing the growth of government.

Position sources (1)

Yee Leng Xiong

Stance · support

Xiong emphasizes his experience managing public budgets and frames the treasurer's role as overseeing school trust funds, supporting low-interest loans for infrastructure, and returning unclaimed money to families.

Position sources (1)
ⓘ What do these stance labels mean?

Each label describes how a candidate has spoken about an issue, drawn from a sourced statement — not our opinion. Support and oppose mean they've clearly taken that side. Mixed means their statements point both ways. Evolving means their stated position has changed over time. Unclear means we couldn't find a clear public statement. Every label links to the source it came from.

How we do this →
ⓘ Sourced position vs. campaign claim — what's the difference?

A sourced position is something we tied to a specific public statement, with a link. A campaign claim is what a candidate's own site says about their priorities. We keep them separate so you can see the difference between a documented stance and a self-description.

How we do this →

How this page was made

Who made this
Tarik Moody, in Milwaukee, independently. No ads, and no party, campaign or PAC money. Nobody has editorial input. About BadgerBrief
How facts get in
Ballot names come from the Wisconsin Elections Commission’s certified list, printed as you will see them. Votes are read from official roll calls; money from the Ethics Commission and the FEC. Positions and quotes appear only after a person checks each one against its source. Methodology
Last updated
Not covered
BadgerBrief does not rate, endorse or predict. Where a fact could not be sourced it is left out, not guessed. Local questions and city or village contests are on MyVote ↗.