Skip to main content
General election: Tuesday, Nov 3. In-person absentee voting may begin Oct 20. Deadlines and how to vote →

← Race pageCertified ballot ↗

Attorney General of Wisconsin

The 2 candidates on the November 3, 2026 ballot, side by side, issue by issue. Each stance is a sourced summary, not a ranking or endorsement.

Or start from the issues you care about →

As printed · ballot order

  1. Eric Toney
    Republican

    Fond du Lac County District Attorney

  2. Josh Kaul
    DemocraticIncumbent

    Incumbent Wisconsin Attorney General

See everyone who ran in the August 11, 2026 primary →

Abortion

Eric Toney

Stance · support

According to the article, during his last campaign Toney promised to defend the 19th century state law that had led to Wisconsin's near-total abortion ban.

Position sources (1)

Josh Kaul

Stance · support

Kaul says he successfully sued to stop an 1848 law banning abortions from being enforced after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the procedure was not constitutionally protected.

Position sources (1)

Elections & democracy

Eric Toney

No sourced position on record.

Josh Kaul

Stance · support

Kaul describes joining multistate lawsuits against the Trump administration, including a suit against an order ending birthright citizenship and efforts to dismantle federal programs.

Position sources (1)

Healthcare

Eric Toney

No sourced position on record.

Josh Kaul

Stance · support

Kaul claims success fighting the opioid epidemic, citing a reported drop in opioid-related deaths and lawsuits against opioid manufacturers and distributors that recovered funds for communities.

Position sources (1)

Immigration

Eric Toney

Stance · support

Toney says he would crack down on what he calls a border crisis and the flow of drugs into Wisconsin, and supports legal immigration while opposing burdens on local resources.

Position sources (1)

Josh Kaul

No sourced position on record.

Public safety

Eric Toney

Stance · support

Toney emphasized support for law enforcement and said he would target violent crime in Milwaukee, which he described as spreading across the state.

Position sources (1)

Josh Kaul

Stance · support

Kaul cites actions on the opioid epidemic, a sexual assault kit tracking system, strengthening the Office of School Safety, and pushing for more resources for crime victims.

Position sources (1)

Taxes & budget

Eric Toney

No sourced position on record.

Josh Kaul

Stance · oppose

Kaul criticizes tax cuts signed into law under Trump, saying they provided benefits for the wealthy rather than working families.

Position sources (1)
ⓘ What do these stance labels mean?

Each label describes how a candidate has spoken about an issue, drawn from a sourced statement — not our opinion. Support and oppose mean they've clearly taken that side. Mixed means their statements point both ways. Evolving means their stated position has changed over time. Unclear means we couldn't find a clear public statement. Every label links to the source it came from.

How we do this →
ⓘ Sourced position vs. campaign claim — what's the difference?

A sourced position is something we tied to a specific public statement, with a link. A campaign claim is what a candidate's own site says about their priorities. We keep them separate so you can see the difference between a documented stance and a self-description.

How we do this →

How this page was made

Who made this
Tarik Moody, in Milwaukee, independently. No ads, and no party, campaign or PAC money. Nobody has editorial input. About BadgerBrief
How facts get in
Ballot names come from the Wisconsin Elections Commission’s certified list, printed as you will see them. Votes are read from official roll calls; money from the Ethics Commission and the FEC. Positions and quotes appear only after a person checks each one against its source. Methodology
Last updated
Not covered
BadgerBrief does not rate, endorse or predict. Where a fact could not be sourced it is left out, not guessed. Local questions and city or village contests are on MyVote ↗.